nordicgirl 于 2002/01/16 10:36:01 发表在 汉英
我想知道是否可以使用这样的句子,
1.He has a head,and with thought.
2.This just is your,that so-called Mamma
请帮助.
---------------
nodicgirl
[ 回应主贴(Respond to Original) ]
[ 返回论坛(Back to Forum) ]
跟贴目录 (List of Followups):
因为你此前连续发出的那两帖语无伦次，看都看不懂，颇象来捣乱的，所以被删。
作者(Author)：汉英 - 2002/01/16 11:59:23
***
以后请注意两点：1)表达要清楚,最好附加上下文；2)把问题集中在同一帖线内，不要逐句、逐题另开帖线，以节省首页版面。
谢谢合作！
[ 回应此贴(Respond to this followup) |
查看原贴(Back to Original) ]
您的问题真是很怪
作者(Author)：laoliu - 2002/01/16 21:50:35
***
口语中这两句都是可以忍受的。
[ 回应此贴(Respond to this followup) |
查看原贴(Back to Original) ]
对不起,阁下的意思,非口语属于错误?能否详细指教?谢谢!
作者(Author)：nodicgirl - 2002/01/17 11:04:19
***
[ 回应此贴(Respond to this followup) |
查看原贴(Back to Original) ]
O.K., it's like this ...
作者(Author)：laoliu - 2002/01/17 15:10:30
***
You see, when you're speaking casually, as opposed to when, eh, you're, let's say, writing an article, the rule, no, rules, are different. The, your sentences get broken up into bit, the subject and the predicate may not be in agreement, the number of! The number of the subject and of the predict is what I mean, excuse me, meant! You will also unconsciously try to correct yourself, without repeating the whole sentence, only the directly affected fragments. Many other wierd things will happen, too. If you tape people's casual conversations, and transcribe it, them, you will know what I'm talking about.
Hope this gives you an idea of the reasoning behind previous my reply.
Really, what is the context, strike that, background of your original question?
[ 回应此贴(Respond to this followup) |
查看原贴(Back to Original) ]
bits and pieces; my previous reply; original questions
作者(Author)：laoliu - 2002/01/17 15:12:35
***
[ 回应此贴(Respond to this followup) |
查看原贴(Back to Original) ]
[ 跟贴目录 (List of Followups) ] [ 返回论坛(Back to Forum) ]