just for fun: to prove there is no god.

Here is an example:
1.If god exists, then he is omnipotent.
2. if god is omnipotent, then he can do anything.
3. Either god can create a rock that he cannot lift, or he cannot.
4. if god can create a rock that he cannot lift, then there is sth that god cannot do, namely, lift the things he can create.
5. if god cannot create a rock that he cannot lift, then there is sth. that god cannot do, namely, create a rock that he cannot lift.
6。 there is something that god cannot do.
7. god is not omnipotent.
8. god does not exist.

Can anybody find out what's wrong with this argument?
the argument is a valid argument which is logic, but what's wrong with it?????? answer is coming up tomorrow.

[ 回应主贴 ] [ 返回论坛 ]

• another examply to prove that god does not exist. - walker 20000601004504
  • It's the Christian god omnipotent ? - The Agnostic 20000601162046
    • i'll talk about the free will and evil thing later on. it's good question to point it out. - walker 20000601212415
• Interesting! I guess it only shows that logic is not universally applicable. - he zi 20000601091826
• But firt thing's first, - xy 20000601101533
  • this is a philosophy question, has nothing to do with religion. - walker 20000601212250
• 可能是违反矛盾律而致的逻辑错误吧：自相矛盾或曰逻辑矛盾。 - px 20000601103406
• what does an insomniac agnostic dyslectic do? - xinqi 20000601110102
  • answer: stays up all night wondering if there is a dog. - xq 20000602013512
• Nothing is wrong. Church is church, science is science(including logic). Better isolated. - wq 20000601113436
• the answer. (the question has nothing to do with religion, there r some other way to prove god does exist. - walker 20000601211739
  • 谢谢！很长见识！ - px 20000602063250
• similar questions, can u get this one? - walker 20000601212130
  • okay, try again... - he zi 20000601221322
  • 供批判。 - tian xin 20000601224136
    • U mean God is just looking on beyond the strife between good and evil although He is all-powerful(omnipotent)? - Logic 20000601231536
      • It could lead to quite involved spiritualistic discussions again if I plunge into the grass heap once more :) - tian xin 20000601233305
    • 哲学的尽头便是宗教，从可知变成不可知，从浅入深，最后不能自拔，于是乎，又变得幼稚起来。比如，马克思说世界是运动的，只有相对的静止，但他又将人类的最终目标定为共产主义，这本身便是自相矛盾的事情。 - Last Hermit 20000602114353
      • 道可道，非常道。非常道非幼稚之道。名可名，非常名；非常名非不可知之名。 - tian xin 20000602193557
• 大家说的都很好，但是还请从哲学的角度下手，提示：what is perfectly good? how do u describe it? - walker 20000603193245
• 理发师的头由谁来理？ - 无言 20000605070857

another examply to prove that god does not exist.

It's the Christian god omnipotent ?

i'll talk about the free will and evil thing later on. it's good question to point it out.

Interesting! I guess it only shows that logic is not universally applicable.

But firt thing's first,

this is a philosophy question, has nothing to do with religion.

可能是违反矛盾律而致的逻辑错误吧：自相矛盾或曰逻辑矛盾。

what does an insomniac agnostic dyslectic do?

answer: stays up all night wondering if there is a dog.

Nothing is wrong. Church is church, science is science(including logic). Better isolated.

the answer. (the question has nothing to do with religion, there r some other way to prove god does exist.

谢谢！很长见识！

similar questions, can u get this one?

okay, try again...

供批判。

U mean God is just looking on beyond the strife between good and evil although He is all-powerful(omnipotent)?

It could lead to quite involved spiritualistic discussions again if I plunge into the grass heap once more :)

哲学的尽头便是宗教，从可知变成不可知，从浅入深，最后不能自拔，于是乎，又变得幼稚起来。比如，马克思说世界是运动的，只有相对的静止，但他又将人类的最终目标定为共产主义，这本身便是自相矛盾的事情。

道可道，非常道。非常道非幼稚之道。名可名，非常名；非常名非不可知之名。

大家说的都很好，但是还请从哲学的角度下手，提示：what is perfectly good? how do u describe it?

理发师的头由谁来理？